Steeg Law is pleased to announce that six of our attorneys have been selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2019 for New Orleans, Louisiana. Robert Steeg is one of a select group of lawyers who has been included for more than 20 years.
Best Lawyers in America by Practice
- Lillian E. Eyrich, Senior Associate – Real Estate Law (10 years)
- David Martinez, Senior Associate – Real Estate Law (5 years)
- Randy Opotowsky, Partner – Banking and Finance Law, Commercial Transactions/UCC Law, Real Estate Law, Litigation – Real Estate (5 years)
- Robert M. Steeg, Managing Partner – Banking and Finance Law, Commercial Finance Law, Commercial Transactions/UCC Law, Corporate Law, Real Estate Law (20 years)
- Charles L. Stern, Jr., Partner – Bet-the-Company Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Litigation – Bankruptcy, Litigation – Real Estate, Real Estate Law (5 years)
Best Lawyers® “Lawyer of the Year,” New Orleans, Louisiana
Three Steeg Law attorneys have previously been named Best Lawyers® “Lawyer of the Year,” New Orleans, Louisiana. This additional recognition is awarded to individual attorneys with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one attorney is recognized as the “Lawyer of the Year” for each specialty and location.
- Charles L. Stern, Jr. – Best Lawyers® 2015 and 2018 New Orleans Litigation – Real Estate “Lawyer of the Year,” New Orleans, LA
- Randy Opotowsky – Best Lawyers® 2014 New Orleans Litigation – Real Estate “Lawyer of the Year,” New Orleans, LA
- Lillian E. Eyrich – Best Lawyers® 2012 “New Orleans Best Lawyers Real Estate Law Lawyer of the Year,” New Orleans, LA
The Best Lawyers in America© Methodology
Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Their methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.
Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Their belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.